US287 - SH1 to the Laport Bypass Website
Project Fact Sheet #4 - Page 2

Project Fact Sheet #4
U.S. 287-S.H. 1 to LaPorte Bypass
Environmental Assessment
November 2000

Environmental - Comments focused on impacts to wetlands, pollutant runoff, noise, and disruption of wildlife. With regards to Alternative B, concerns focused on segregation of farmland, visual resources, and historic resources.

Noise - Concerns focused on truck noise, particularly jake brakes, and the impacts to humans and wildlife. Attendees felt that an earthen berm and restricting truck traffic would help reduce noise levels, as well as reduce accident risk.

Access - All in attendance at the open house acknowledged the current access problems. Attendees opposed a raised median for the following reasons: limited turn movements, lack of roads in the area to turn around, and inconsistency with other roads in the area. Business owners were concerned with having sufficient access in both directions and entrances to accommodate semi-trailers.

Design - Comments supported the proposed typical sections as displayed at the open house, opposed the raised median, and liked the sidewalk. In addition, there was concern over the proposed speed limit along the new route (Alt. B).

Alternatives A4 and A5 - Comments received in support of A4 and A5 include: maintaining noise and traffic within the existing corridor, minimal wetland disruption, it maintains the open space, and it does not disrupt current agricultural uses. However, negative comments were expressed towards the high number of home and business impacts. One concern noted the potential negative effects A5 could have on the water table.

Alternative B - Comments received in support of B focused on the limited impacts to homes and businesses compared to the other alternatives. However, opposing comments include the following: it would destroy more croplands and wetlands, there would be more aesthetic impacts, and it would disrupt current agricultural practices.

Use of the Comments
Both agency and public comments have been compiled and will be reviewed by CDOT and the project team. The comments are being considered as the EA progresses.

Page 1 - Page 2 - Page 3 - Area Map